myHotTake

Tag: JavaScript automation

  • How to Manage Test Dependencies in JavaScript Automation

    Hey there! If you enjoy this story, feel free to like or share it so others can join in the fun.


    I’m a teacher grading a stack of essays. Each essay represents a test case in my automation suite. Now, as I go through them, I notice something peculiar. Some essays are written in pencil, some in ink, and a few in colorful markers. But there’s a catch—many of these essays rely on the content of others to make sense, just like how some of my test cases depend on certain conditions or data from other tests.

    As I mark these essays, I realize I need to use my red pen to correct errors and ensure clarity. But here’s the twist: my red pen symbolizes the strategies I use in JavaScript to manage these test dependencies.

    First, I identify the dependent essays—those that might overlap or lean heavily on the conclusions of others. In JavaScript, this step involves recognizing test cases that might share setup or teardown conditions. With my red pen, I circle these dependencies, just like I’d use tags or comments in my code to highlight interconnected parts.

    Next, I tackle the issue of order. Some essays need to be graded before others, just as some tests must run in a specific sequence. Here, my red pen becomes my tool for numbering essays, establishing a clear order. In my test scripts, I employ asynchronous functions to control execution flow, ensuring every test runs at the right moment.

    Finally, I use my red pen to jot down notes and suggestions in the margins. These notes are like mocks and stubs in my JavaScript tests, simulating conditions and responses that keep everything running smoothly without relying on external systems.


    Identifying Dependencies

    Just like circling dependent essays, I start by identifying dependencies in my tests. In JavaScript, I can use comments or naming conventions to highlight these relationships. For instance:

    // test/userRegistration.js
    describe('User Registration', function() {
      it('should register a new user', function() {
        // Test logic here
      });
    });
    
    // test/userLogin.js
    describe('User Login', function() {
      // Depends on user registration
      it('should log in an existing user', function() {
        // Test logic here
      });
    });

    The comment in userLogin.js acts as a red pen circle, alerting me that this test relies on userRegistration.js.

    Controlling Order

    To ensure tests are executed in a specific order, akin to numbering essays, I use asynchronous functions and test runners like Mocha or Jest. Here’s how I might enforce order:

    describe('User Workflow', function() {
      it('should register a new user', function(done) {
        // Simulate async registration process
        setTimeout(() => {
          // Registration logic
          done();
        }, 1000);
      });
    
      it('should log in an existing user', function(done) {
        // Simulate async login process
        setTimeout(() => {
          // Login logic
          done();
        }, 1000);
      });
    });

    The done callback ensures each test waits for the asynchronous process to complete, keeping the execution orderly.

    Using Mocks and Stubs

    Finally, to simulate conditions as if I’m jotting notes in the margins, I rely on mocks and stubs. They help isolate tests and manage dependencies without external interference:

    const sinon = require('sinon');
    const userService = require('../services/userService');
    
    describe('User Login', function() {
      let loginStub;
    
      beforeEach(function() {
        loginStub = sinon.stub(userService, 'login').resolves({ success: true });
      });
    
      afterEach(function() {
        loginStub.restore();
      });
    
      it('should log in an existing user', async function() {
        const response = await userService.login('testUser', 'password123');
        sinon.assert.calledOnce(loginStub);
        expect(response.success).to.be.true;
      });
    });

    In this example, sinon.stub acts as my red pen note, ensuring the login process behaves predictably during the test.

    Key Takeaways

    • Identify Dependencies: Use comments or naming conventions to highlight test dependencies.
    • Control Order: Utilize asynchronous functions and callbacks to maintain the correct sequence of test execution.
    • Use Mocks and Stubs: Isolate tests from external dependencies by simulating conditions, ensuring reliable and independent test outcomes.
  • How Does Visual Regression Testing Enhance JavaScript Apps?

    Hey there! If you enjoy this story and find it helpful, feel free to give it a like or share it with your friends!


    I’m in my digital workshop, where I’m designing a 3D model using software. Each detail matters because even the smallest error can make the final piece look odd. This is where my trusty tool, visual regression testing, comes into play, just like a magnifying glass that helps me scrutinize every tiny aspect of my creation.

    I start by creating the basic shape of my model in the software, akin to writing my initial code. The 3D model looks good, but I know that as I add more features and details, things can shift unexpectedly. Just like in coding, where new changes might inadvertently affect the old ones, I need something that will alert me to these subtle shifts.

    To tackle this, I take a snapshot of my model at its current state, capturing every angle and detail. This is my baseline, a reference point that tells me how my model should look. In the world of JavaScript, this is like capturing the perfect rendering of a web page before I make further changes.

    As I continue to add features to my model, perhaps a new texture or a more intricate design, I regularly take new snapshots. Each time I do this, I compare these new images against my baseline. It’s like having a vigilant assistant who whispers in my ear, “Hey, that new texture is warping the model’s shape, just a bit!”


    First, I set up my environment to capture the baseline snapshot. In JavaScript, this is akin to writing a script that captures the initial state of my web page:

    const { initStoryshots } = require('@storybook/addon-storyshots');
    const { imageSnapshot } = require('@storybook/addon-storyshots-puppeteer');
    
    initStoryshots({
      suite: 'Image storyshots',
      test: imageSnapshot(),
    });

    This code sets up a test suite that takes a snapshot of your storybook components. It’s like taking that first pristine image of my 3D model.

    Next, as I continue to refine my model, I periodically capture new images to compare with my baseline. Using tools like Cypress with a visual testing plugin, I can automate this comparison:

    describe('Visual Regression Test', () => {
      it('should display the homepage correctly', () => {
        cy.visit('/');
        cy.matchImageSnapshot();
      });
    });

    Here, I visit the page and compare the current state with the baseline snapshot. It’s as if I’m overlaying the new version of my model over the original to spot any differences.

    When discrepancies are found, these tools highlight the differences, much like my vigilant assistant pointing out the warped texture. I can then dive into my code, make necessary adjustments, and retest until the differences are resolved.

    Key Takeaways:

    1. Baseline Creation: Just like capturing that initial 3D model, always start by creating a baseline snapshot of your web component or page. This serves as your reference point.
    2. Regular Comparisons: Automate the process of capturing and comparing new snapshots with the baseline. This helps catch any unintended visual changes early.
    3. Tool Selection: Choose the right tools for your needs. Tools like Storybook with Puppeteer, Cypress, or BackstopJS provide powerful capabilities for visual regression testing.
    4. Efficiency and Quality: By integrating visual regression testing into your workflow, you ensure that your web applications maintain their intended look and feel, much like ensuring the perfection of a 3D model.
  • How to Pack Your Web Testing Suitcase with Cypress & Playwright

    If you enjoy this storytelling journey, consider giving it a thumbs up or sharing it with fellow adventurers!


    I’m preparing for an epic journey, one that requires the utmost precision in packing my suitcase. This isn’t just any trip; it’s an adventure into the world of web testing. My destination? The lands of Cypress and Playwright.

    First, I lay out my suitcase, which is like initializing my project—clean and ready to be filled with essentials. I decide to bring Cypress along for this journey. I pull out the suitcase of my project folder and, with a quick incantation at the command line, I summon Cypress into existence: npm install cypress. As if by magic, my suitcase is now equipped with a robust framework that will help me navigate the tricky terrains of web testing.

    Next, I need to pack my essentials. I add a touch of configuration, much like placing my favorite book or travel guide into the suitcase. I create a cypress.json file, setting up the rules and preferences for my journey, ensuring everything is in its rightful place.

    But wait, there’s another traveler who could join me—Playwright. Curious about what new experiences it might offer, I decide to make space in my suitcase for it as well. I open my terminal again and invite Playwright into the fold with npm install playwright. Now, my suitcase is even more versatile, ready for any testing adventure I might face.

    With both Cypress and Playwright nestled snugly in my suitcase, I add a few finishing touches—scripts in my package.json file to launch these testing companions whenever the need arises. It’s like packing a handy travel pillow or a map, ensuring I’m ready for any situation.


    First, let’s open up our suitcase and take a look at Cypress. I start by creating a new test file within the cypress/integration directory. It’s like opening my travel journal and jotting down my first impressions. Here’s a simple test to make sure everything is in order:

    describe('My First Test', () => {
      it('Visits the Cypress documentation page', () => {
        cy.visit('https://docs.cypress.io');
        cy.contains('Introduction').should('be.visible');
      });
    });

    This is my first entry, a straightforward test that visits the Cypress documentation page and checks for the visibility of the “Introduction” text. It’s as simple as snapping a photo of a landmark to remember I was there.

    Now, let’s make room for Playwright in our narrative. I create a new file in my project, say test.spec.js. Here’s how my exploration unfolds with Playwright:

    const { chromium } = require('playwright');
    
    (async () => {
      const browser = await chromium.launch();
      const page = await browser.newPage();
      await page.goto('https://playwright.dev');
      await page.click('text=Get Started');
      await browser.close();
    })();

    In this scene, I’m launching a browser, navigating to the Playwright documentation, and clicking the “Get Started” link. It feels like taking a leisurely stroll down a well-marked path, exploring the surroundings with curiosity.

    With both Cypress and Playwright, I find myself equipped for any testing scenario. Cypress offers an intuitive and powerful way to write tests with its declarative syntax, while Playwright provides flexibility and control over browser automation, capable of handling complex user interactions.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Cypress and Playwright are powerful tools for automating web testing, each with its unique strengths.
    • Cypress is great for writing straightforward tests with its easy-to-read syntax and built-in features like time travel debugging.
    • Playwright offers rich browser automation capabilities, supporting multiple browsers and providing fine-grained control over web interactions.
    • Integrating these tools into a JavaScript project enhances test coverage and reliability, ensuring a smoother development process.
  • Why is Cypress Essential for JavaScript Testing Success?

    Hey there! If you find this story interesting, feel free to give it a like or share it with your friends who love both science and coding. Now, let me take you on a little journey into the world of JavaScript testing with Cypress, all through the lens of conducting a science experiment in class.


    It’s science class, and I’m the curious student ready to dive into an exciting experiment. The room is buzzing with anticipation. In front of me, I have all the tools I need—beakers, chemicals, and a detailed experiment guide. This setup is just like Cypress in the coding world, providing everything I need to test my JavaScript applications efficiently.

    First off, I have my beakers and test tubes carefully organized. They remind me of Cypress’s ability to provide a consistent testing environment. No matter what happens, I know that every time I pour my solutions, the results will be reliable and predictable. With Cypress, I don’t have to worry about different browsers behaving unpredictably—it’s like having a controlled lab environment right on my computer.

    As I follow my experiment steps, I notice how easy it is to see my results. The color changes are just like Cypress’s real-time feedback. It’s immediate and clear, allowing me to instantly know if my hypothesis is working or if I need to adjust. This instant feedback loop keeps my energy high and my focus sharp, just like those satisfying moments when I watch my code run smoothly in Cypress, highlighting successes and errors instantly.

    Then, there’s the thrill of discovering something unexpected. Sometimes, the experiment takes a surprising turn, which is much like Cypress’s ability to catch edge cases. It’s as if it has an extra pair of eyes, helping me notice the small details that I might have missed otherwise. This thoroughness ensures that I understand my experiment fully and that my application runs flawlessly.

    Lastly, there’s the sense of community in the classroom—everyone sharing observations and findings. Similarly, Cypress’s extensive documentation and supportive community feel like having classmates ready to help. Whenever I hit a snag, I know that there’s a wealth of knowledge to tap into, just like raising my hand and asking for a bit of guidance during the experiment.


    First, just like when I organized my beakers, I set up my Cypress environment with a configuration file. It’s as if I’m arranging my lab space to ensure everything runs smoothly. Here’s a basic setup:

    // cypress.json
    {
      "baseUrl": "http://localhost:3000",
      "viewportWidth": 1280,
      "viewportHeight": 720
    }

    This configuration ensures that every test runs with the same parameters, providing consistency just like my controlled lab environment.

    Now, onto the real-time feedback—the exciting color changes in the experiment. In Cypress, writing a test is straightforward, and the feedback is immediate. Here’s how I might test that a button in my app changes color when clicked:

    describe('Color Change Test', () => {
      it('should change color on button click', () => {
        cy.visit('/experiment');
        cy.get('#colorButton').click();
        cy.get('#colorButton').should('have.css', 'background-color', 'rgb(255, 0, 0)');
      });
    });

    Running this test, I immediately see whether my expectations are met, just like watching the solution change color in real time. Cypress gives me that instant gratification and the ability to adjust if something doesn’t go as planned.

    Remember the thrill of discovering unexpected results? With Cypress, I can delve deeper by testing edge cases, ensuring I catch those unforeseen scenarios. For instance, checking how the app behaves with invalid input:

    describe('Edge Case Test', () => {
      it('should handle invalid input gracefully', () => {
        cy.visit('/experiment');
        cy.get('#inputField').type('invalid input');
        cy.get('#submitButton').click();
        cy.get('#errorMessage').should('contain', 'Invalid input, please try again.');
      });
    });

    Cypress helps me ensure my application is robust, much like making sure my experiment accounts for all possible outcomes.

    And finally, the sense of community. Whenever I hit a roadblock, whether in my experiment or coding, I turn to Cypress’s documentation or forums. It’s like asking my classmates for help—there’s always someone who has faced a similar challenge and can offer advice.


    Key Takeaways:

    1. Consistent Environment: Just as a controlled lab ensures reliable results, Cypress provides a stable environment for testing JavaScript applications.
    2. Immediate Feedback: Like observing instant changes in an experiment, Cypress offers real-time feedback, making it easy to detect and fix issues.
    3. Thorough Testing: By catching edge cases, Cypress ensures applications are robust, similar to accounting for all variables in a science experiment.
    4. Community Support: Leveraging Cypress’s community and documentation is akin to collaborating with classmates, enhancing learning and problem-solving.